sunjincheng121 commented on a change in pull request #6873: [hotfix] Add Review
Progress section to PR description template.
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6873#discussion_r226525062
##########
File path: .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
##########
@@ -70,3 +70,17 @@ This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
- Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
- If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs /
not documented)
+
+----
+
+# Review Progress
+
+**NOTE: THE REVIEW PROGRESS MUST ONLY BE UPDATED BY AN APACHE FLINK
COMMITTER!**
+
+* [ ] 1. The contribution is well-described.
+* [ ] 2. There is consensus that the contribution should go into to Flink.
+* [ ] 3. [Does not need specific attention | Needs specific attention for X |
Has attention for X by Y]
Review comment:
About [3], If the committer identifies [Needs specific attention for X],
what do we need to do with PR?
From the points of my view, the committer who change the review process,
have to make sure all the specific attention parts are solved.So the [3] should
be described : [ ] 3. All the specific attention parts are well-solved.
What do you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services
