[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16656237#comment-16656237
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10527:
----------------------------------------

yanghua commented on a change in pull request #6816: [FLINK-10527] Cleanup 
constant isNewMode in YarnTestBase
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6816#discussion_r226526901
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-yarn-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/yarn/YARNSessionCapacitySchedulerITCase.java
 ##########
 @@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ public void perJobYarnClusterOffHeap() throws IOException {
        /**
         * Test TaskManager failure and also if the vcores are set correctly 
(see issue FLINK-2213).
         */
+       @Ignore
        @Test(timeout = 100000) // timeout after 100 seconds
        public void testTaskManagerFailure() throws Exception {
-               assumeTrue("The new mode does not start TMs upfront.", 
!isNewMode);
 
 Review comment:
   @tillrohrmann So, is your review suggestion still the same? Do we still need 
to keep the isNewMode field? (About these methods, I have created a [separate 
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10558) to track them, I 
think we will not forget them in the end).

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Cleanup constant isNewMode in YarnTestBase
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10527
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: YARN
>            Reporter: vinoyang
>            Assignee: vinoyang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> This seems to be a residual problem with FLINK-10396. It is set to true in 
> that PR. Currently it has three usage scenarios:
> 1. assert, caused an error
> {code:java}
> assumeTrue("The new mode does not start TMs upfront.", !isNewMode);
> {code}
> 2. if (!isNewMode) the logic in the block would not have invoked, the if 
> block can be removed
> 3. if (isNewMode) always been invoked, the if statement can be removed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to