[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16660371#comment-16660371
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10356:
----------------------------------------

NicoK commented on issue #6705: [FLINK-10356][network] add sanity checks to 
SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6705#issuecomment-432180676
 
 
   thanks again @zhijiangW - I updated the tests accordingly.
   
   Regarding performance: there may be a penalty from these checks but it is 
actually not much work after all: we are just comparing indices. Anyway, I 
think, the additional safety here is worth a potential performance impact.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Add sanity checks to SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10356
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10356
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, 1.5.4, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Nico Kruber
>            Assignee: Nico Kruber
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {{SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer}} doesn't have any consistency 
> checks for usage calls or serializers behaving properly, e.g. to read only as 
> many bytes as available/promised for that record. At least these checks 
> should be added:
>  # Check that buffers have not been read from yet before adding them (this is 
> an invariant {{SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer}} works with and 
> from what I can see, it is followed now.
>  # Check that after deserialization, we actually consumed {{recordLength}} 
> bytes
>  ** If not, in the spanning deserializer, we currently simply skip the 
> remaining bytes.
>  ** But in the non-spanning deserializer, we currently continue from the 
> wrong offset.
>  # Protect against {{setNextBuffer}} being called before draining all 
> available records



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to