[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16673179#comment-16673179
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-10356:
----------------------------------------
NicoK commented on a change in pull request #6705: [FLINK-10356][network] add
sanity checks to SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6705#discussion_r230398908
##########
File path:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/api/serialization/SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer.java
##########
@@ -121,7 +134,14 @@ else if (remaining == 0) {
}
}
catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException e) {
- throw new
IOException(BROKEN_SERIALIZATION_ERROR_MESSAGE, e);
+ int bytesRead =
this.nonSpanningWrapper.position - oldPosition;
Review comment:
Actually, now, we cannot ever get to the case that line 133 shows - I'll
change that to a `checkState` instead.
I can de-dup a bit but will have to add two position parameters because it
is not always a `nonSpanningWrapper` for which we would know what to insert
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Add sanity checks to SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-10356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10356
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Network
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.3, 1.5.4, 1.6.0, 1.6.1, 1.7.0
> Reporter: Nico Kruber
> Assignee: Nico Kruber
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> {{SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer}} doesn't have any consistency
> checks for usage calls or serializers behaving properly, e.g. to read only as
> many bytes as available/promised for that record. At least these checks
> should be added:
> # Check that buffers have not been read from yet before adding them (this is
> an invariant {{SpillingAdaptiveSpanningRecordDeserializer}} works with and
> from what I can see, it is followed now.
> # Check that after deserialization, we actually consumed {{recordLength}}
> bytes
> ** If not, in the spanning deserializer, we currently simply skip the
> remaining bytes.
> ** But in the non-spanning deserializer, we currently continue from the
> wrong offset.
> # Protect against {{setNextBuffer}} being called before draining all
> available records
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
