[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16712272#comment-16712272
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-11010:
----------------------------------------

walterddr commented on issue #7180: [FLINK-11010] [TABLE] Flink SQL timestamp 
is inconsistent with currentProcessingTime()
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7180#issuecomment-445103065
 
 
   Hi @lamber-ken sorry for the late response. I am a bit confuse with the JIRA 
ticket description and the PR comments. 
   
   I am under the impression that the goal should make all internal times 
GMT-based regardless of where the code runs. Thus `currentProcessingTime()` 
should return a GMT-based time. if my understanding is correct, shouldn't the 
fix be in the "timerService" side instead?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> Flink SQL timestamp is inconsistent with currentProcessingTime()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-11010
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11010
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.2
>            Reporter: lamber-ken
>            Assignee: lamber-ken
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Flink SQL timestamp is inconsistent with currentProcessingTime().
>  
> the ProcessingTime is just implemented by invoking System.currentTimeMillis() 
> but the long value will be automatically wrapped to a Timestamp with the 
> following statement: 
> `new java.sql.Timestamp(time - TimeZone.getDefault().getOffset(time));`



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to