[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16732702#comment-16732702
 ] 

jiwei commented on FLINK-11230:
-------------------------------

[~hequn8128],I have changed EventTimeTrigger to ContinuousEventTimeTrigger. 
Through testing, we found that it's useful to getting the correct __ result for 
a single stream.Why it's change the result by using union all and sum?

> Sum of FlinkSql after two table union all.The value is too large.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-11230
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11230
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: jiwei
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: test
>         Attachments: image-2019-01-02-14-18-33-890.png, 
> image-2019-01-02-14-18-43-710.png, screenshot-1.png
>
>
> SELECT k AS KEY, SUM(p) AS pv
>  FROM (
>  SELECT tumble_start(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute) AS k
>  , COUNT(*) AS p
>  FROM flink_test1
>  GROUP BY tumble(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute)
>  UNION ALL
>  SELECT tumble_start(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute) AS k
>  , COUNT(*) AS p
>  FROM flink_test2
>  GROUP BY tumble(stime, INTERVAL '1' minute)
>  ) t
>  GROUP BY k
> The Result of executing this sql is about 7000 per minute and keeping 
> increasing.But the result is 60 per minute for per table.Is there an error in 
> my SQL statement?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to