Github user mjsax commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/750#discussion_r38132263
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/TaskManager.scala
 ---
    @@ -411,6 +411,23 @@ class TaskManager(
                 log.debug(s"Cannot find task to fail for execution 
${executionID})")
               }
     
    +        // stops a task
    +        case StopTask(executionID) =>
    +          val task = runningTasks.get(executionID)
    +          if (task != null) {
    +            try {
    +              task.stopExecution()
    --- End diff --
    
    Well. We know, that stop is only sent to sources, thus, the user function 
is of type `SourceFunction`. The `cancel()` method has the following JavaDoc:
    ```
        /**
         * Cancels the source. Most sources will have a while loop inside the
         * {@link #run} method. You need to ensure that the source will break 
out of this loop. This
         * can be achieved by having a volatile field "isRunning" that is 
checked in the loop and that
         * is set to false in this method.
         */
        void cancel();
    ```
    I interpreted this a a non-blocking function. Even if this requirement is 
not specified explicitly. We could just do this (need to talk to other 
streaming folk about implication though). Or we add a new method `stop()` to 
`SourceFunction`. However, this implies to change a lot of code... All classes 
implementing `SourceFunction` need to get extended (this was another reason why 
I just used `cancel()`).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to