[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Yu Li resolved FLINK-11986.
---------------------------
       Resolution: Implemented
    Fix Version/s: 1.9.0

PR already merged and integrated into our Jenkins and 
[SpeedCenter|http://codespeed.dak8s.net:8000/timeline/#/?exe=3&ben=grid&env=2&revs=200&equid=off&quarts=on&extr=on],
 closing issue. Thanks [~pnowojski] for review and merge the PR, and thanks 
[~srichter] for review.

> Add micro benchmark for state operations
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-11986
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11986
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / State Backends, Tests
>            Reporter: Yu Li
>            Assignee: Yu Li
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> Currently in the 
> [flink-benchmark|https://github.com/dataArtisans/flink-benchmarks] project we 
> already have a JMH case for the whole backend, but none for finer grained 
> state operations, and here we propose adding JMH cases for them, including 
> (but not limited to):
>  * ValueState
>  ** testPut
>  ** testGet
>  * ListState
>  ** testUpdate
>  ** testGet
>  ** testAddAll
>  * MapState
>  ** testPut
>  ** testGet
>  ** testContains
>  ** testKeys
>  ** testValues
>  ** testEntries
>  ** testIterator
>  ** testRemove
>  ** testPutAll
> And we will create benchmark for {{HeapKeyedStateBackend}} and 
> {{RocksDBKeyedStateBackend}} separately.
> We believe these micro benchmarks could help locate where the regression 
> comes from in case any observed from the backend benchmark, and we could also 
> use these benchmarks to assure no performance downgrade when modifying 
> relative codes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to