[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-12171:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> The network buffer memory size should not be checked against the heap size on 
> the TM side
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12171
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.2, 1.8.0
>         Environment: Flink-1.7.2, and Flink-1.8 seems have not modified the 
> logic here.
>  
>            Reporter: Yun Gao
>            Assignee: Yun Gao
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Currently when computing the network buffer memory size on the TM side in 
> _TaskManagerService#calculateNetworkBufferMemory_`(version 1.8 or 1.7) or 
> _NetworkEnvironmentConfiguration#calculateNewNetworkBufferMemory_(master), 
> the computed network buffer memory size is checked to be less than 
> `maxJvmHeapMemory`. However, in TM side, _maxJvmHeapMemory_ stores the 
> maximum heap memory (namely -Xmx) .
>  
> With the above process, when TM starts, -Xmx is computed in RM or in 
> _taskmanager.sh_ with (container memory - network buffer memory - managed 
> memory),  thus the above checking implies that the heap memory of the TM must 
> be larger than the network memory, which seems to be not necessary.
>  
>  
> Therefore, I think the network buffer memory size also need to be checked 
> against the total memory instead of the heap memory on the TM  side:
>  # Checks that networkBufFraction < 1.0.
>  # Compute the total memory by ( jvmHeapNoNet / (1 - networkBufFraction)).
>  # Compare the network buffer memory with the total memory.
> This checking is also consistent with the similar one done on the RM side.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to