[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16900960#comment-16900960
 ] 

Andrey Zagrebin commented on FLINK-13581:
-----------------------------------------

Yes, this problem would be solved.

The execution attempts are incremented a lot w/o running user code. The final 
counters will of course differ comparing to the whole job restart w/o fine 
grained recovery. My concern here was always that we do not check what the user 
observes. On the other hand, test should be more stable and will not depend on 
internal details of when the the user code is touched.

The other solutions around stabilising the port difference among all TMs are 
probably more involved with relying on the mini cluster internals and might be 
fragile.

> BatchFineGrainedRecoveryITCase failed on Travis
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-13581
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13581
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0
>            Reporter: Andrey Zagrebin
>            Assignee: Andrey Zagrebin
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: test-stability
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>
> [https://travis-ci.com/flink-ci/flink/jobs/221567908]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to