[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16940609#comment-16940609 ]
sunjincheng commented on FLINK-14250: ------------------------------------- I'm glad to see this proposal [~aljoscha]!(y) I think simplify the command-line parsing is a good idea. I go through the code and share my thoughts as following: How about we add a new `RunPyOption` and putting all the Python command-line parsing logic into it. We can add the language check in `CliFrontend#run()` and using `RunPyOption` if it's Python program. In this way, we can flexible extend in future if we want to add other language support such as GO. What do you think? > Introduce separate "bin/flink runpy" and remove python support from > "bin/flink run" > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: FLINK-14250 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14250 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Client / Job Submission > Reporter: Aljoscha Krettek > Priority: Major > > Currently, "bin/flink run" supports both Java and Python programs and there > is quite some complexity in command line parsing and validation and the code > is spread across different classes. > I think if we had a separate "bin/flink runpy" then we could simplify the > parsing quite a bit and the usage help of each command would only show those > options that are relevant for the given use case. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)