tillrohrmann commented on a change in pull request #10748: 
[FLINK-15458][conf][docs] Add support for whitelisting ambiguous options 
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/10748#discussion_r365309969
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-docs/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/docs/configuration/ConfigOptionsDocsCompletenessITCase.java
 ##########
 @@ -61,50 +64,105 @@
 
        private static final Formatter htmlFormatter = new HtmlFormatter();
 
+       // options for which we allow distinct definitions
+       // this allows reporters to define their own options that are 
technically only key suffixes
+       private static final Set<String> WELL_DEFINED_WHITELIST = new 
HashSet<>(Arrays.asList(
+               "host",
+               "port"
+       ));
+
        @Test
        public void testCommonSectionCompleteness() throws IOException, 
ClassNotFoundException {
-               Map<String, DocumentedOption> documentedOptions = 
parseDocumentedCommonOptions();
-               Map<String, ExistingOption> existingOptions = 
findExistingOptions(
+               Map<String, List<DocumentedOption>> documentedOptions = 
parseDocumentedCommonOptions();
+               Map<String, List<ExistingOption>> existingOptions = 
findExistingOptions(
                        optionWithMetaInfo -> 
optionWithMetaInfo.field.getAnnotation(Documentation.CommonOption.class) != 
null);
 
+               assertDocumentedOptionsAreWellDefined(documentedOptions);
+               assertExistingOptionsAreWellDefined(existingOptions);
+
                compareDocumentedAndExistingOptions(documentedOptions, 
existingOptions);
        }
 
        @Test
        public void testFullReferenceCompleteness() throws IOException, 
ClassNotFoundException {
-               Map<String, DocumentedOption> documentedOptions = 
parseDocumentedOptions();
-               Map<String, ExistingOption> existingOptions = 
findExistingOptions(ignored -> true);
+               Map<String, List<DocumentedOption>> documentedOptions = 
parseDocumentedOptions();
+               Map<String, List<ExistingOption>> existingOptions = 
findExistingOptions(ignored -> true);
+
+               assertDocumentedOptionsAreWellDefined(documentedOptions);
+               assertExistingOptionsAreWellDefined(existingOptions);
 
                compareDocumentedAndExistingOptions(documentedOptions, 
existingOptions);
        }
 
-       private static void compareDocumentedAndExistingOptions(Map<String, 
DocumentedOption> documentedOptions, Map<String, ExistingOption> 
existingOptions) {
+       private static void assertDocumentedOptionsAreWellDefined(Map<String, 
List<DocumentedOption>> documentedOptions) {
+               assertOptionsAreWellDefined(documentedOptions, (option1, 
option2) -> {
+                               // found a ConfigOption pair with the same key 
that aren't equal
+                               // we fail here outright as this is not a 
documentation-completeness problem
+                               if 
(!option1.defaultValue.equals(option2.defaultValue)) {
+                                       throw new AssertionError("Documentation 
contains distinct defaults for " +
+                                               option1.key + " in " + 
option1.containingFile + " and " + option2.containingFile + '.');
+                               } else {
+                                       throw new AssertionError("Documentation 
contains distinct descriptions for " +
+                                               option1.key + " in " + 
option1.containingFile + " and " + option2.containingFile + '.');
+                               }
+                       });
+       }
+
+       private static void assertExistingOptionsAreWellDefined(Map<String, 
List<ExistingOption>> existingOptions) {
+               assertOptionsAreWellDefined(existingOptions, (option1, option2) 
-> {
+                               // found a ConfigOption pair with the same key 
that aren't equal
+                               // we fail here outright as this is not a 
documentation-completeness problem
+                               if 
(!option1.defaultValue.equals(option2.defaultValue)) {
+                                       throw new AssertionError("Ambiguous 
option " + option1.key + " due to distinct default values (" + 
option1.defaultValue + " vs " + option2.defaultValue + ").");
+                               } else {
+                                       throw new AssertionError("Ambiguous 
option " + option1.key + " due to distinct descriptions.");
+                               }
+                       });
+       }
+
+       private static <O> void assertOptionsAreWellDefined(Map<String, 
List<O>> allOptions, BiFunction<O, O, AssertionError> duplicateHandler) {
+               allOptions.entrySet().stream()
+                       .filter(entry -> 
!WELL_DEFINED_WHITELIST.contains(entry.getKey()))
+                       .map(Map.Entry::getValue)
+                       .forEach(options -> options.stream().reduce((option1, 
option2) -> {
+                               if (option1.equals(option2)) {
+                                       // we allow multiple instances of 
ConfigOptions with the same key if they are identical
+                                       return option1;
+                               } else {
+                                       throw duplicateHandler.apply(option1, 
option2);
+                               }
+                       }));
+       }
+
+       private static void compareDocumentedAndExistingOptions(Map<String, 
List<DocumentedOption>> documentedOptions, Map<String, List<ExistingOption>> 
existingOptions) {
                final Collection<String> problems = new ArrayList<>(0);
 
                // first check that all existing options are properly documented
-               existingOptions.forEach((key, supposedState) -> {
-                       DocumentedOption documentedState = 
documentedOptions.remove(key);
-
-                       // if nothing matches the docs for this option are 
up-to-date
-                       if (documentedState == null) {
-                               // option is not documented at all
-                               problems.add("Option " + supposedState.key + " 
in " + supposedState.containingClass + " is not documented.");
-                       } else if 
(!supposedState.defaultValue.equals(documentedState.defaultValue)) {
-                               // default is outdated
-                               problems.add("Documented default of " + 
supposedState.key + " in " + supposedState.containingClass +
-                                       " is outdated. Expected: " + 
supposedState.defaultValue + " Actual: " + documentedState.defaultValue);
-                       } else if 
(!supposedState.description.equals(documentedState.description)) {
-                               // description is outdated
-                               problems.add("Documented description of " + 
supposedState.key + " in " + supposedState.containingClass +
-                                       " is outdated.");
+               existingOptions.forEach((key, supposedStates) -> {
+                       List<DocumentedOption> documentedState = 
documentedOptions.remove(key);
+
+                       for (ExistingOption supposedState : supposedStates) {
+                               if (documentedState == null || 
documentedState.isEmpty()) {
+                                       // option is not documented at all
+                                       problems.add("Option " + 
supposedState.key + " in " + supposedState.containingClass + " is not 
documented.");
+                               } else if 
(documentedState.stream().noneMatch(documentedOption -> 
supposedState.defaultValue.equals(documentedOption.defaultValue))) {
+                                       // default is outdated
+                                       problems.add("Documented default of " + 
supposedState.key + " in " + supposedState.containingClass +
+                                               " is outdated. Expected: " + 
supposedState.defaultValue);
+                               } else if 
(documentedState.stream().noneMatch(documentedOption -> 
supposedState.description.equals(documentedOption.description))) {
+                                       // description is outdated
+                                       problems.add("Documented description of 
" + supposedState.key + " in " + supposedState.containingClass +
+                                               " is outdated.");
+                               } else {
+                                       // the docs for this option are 
up-to-date
+                               }
 
 Review comment:
   I think we won't fail if we have a `DocumentedOption` which has no 
corresponding `ExistingOption` since we are only looking whether there is a 
`DocumentedOption` for every `ExistingOption`.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to