[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bowen Li updated FLINK-16023:
-----------------------------
    Description: 
jdbc connector's 'connector.table' property should be optional rather than 
required.

connector should assume the table name in dbms is the same as that in Flink 
when this property is not present

The fundamental reason is that such a design didn't consider integration with 
catalogs. Once introduced catalog, the flink table's name should be just the 
'table''s name in corresponding external system. 

cc [~ykt836]

  was:
jdbc connector's 'connector.table' property should be optional rather than 
required.

connector should assume the table name in dbms is the same as that in Flink 
when this property is not present

 

cc [~ykt836]


> jdbc connector's 'connector.table' property should be optional rather than 
> required
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-16023
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16023
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connectors / JDBC
>            Reporter: Bowen Li
>            Assignee: Jingsong Lee
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> jdbc connector's 'connector.table' property should be optional rather than 
> required.
> connector should assume the table name in dbms is the same as that in Flink 
> when this property is not present
> The fundamental reason is that such a design didn't consider integration with 
> catalogs. Once introduced catalog, the flink table's name should be just the 
> 'table''s name in corresponding external system. 
> cc [~ykt836]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to