[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17061775#comment-17061775
]
Jiayi Liao commented on FLINK-16001:
------------------------------------
[~gjy] You're right that this doesn't help the performance. I'm convinced.
I'll try to improve performance from other places and thanks for your detailed
guidance and explanation :)
Closing this.
> Avoid using Java Streams in construction of ExecutionGraph
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-16001
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16001
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Runtime / Coordination
> Affects Versions: 1.10.0
> Reporter: Jiayi Liao
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: benchmark.csv
>
>
> I think we should avoid {{Java Streams}} in construction of
> {{ExecutionGraph}} like function {{toPipelinedRegionsSet}} in
> {{PipelinedRegionComputeUtil}} because the job submission is definitely
> performance sensitive, especially when {{distinctRegions}} has a large
> cardinality.
> Also includes some other places in package
> {{org.apache.flink.runtime.executiongraph}}
> cc [~trohrmann] [~gjy] [~zhuzh]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
