[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17075117#comment-17075117
]
Piotr Nowojski commented on FLINK-16850:
----------------------------------------
>From what I've heard the customers were checking transitive dependency tree
>starting from the POM files in our repository, so JMH would pollute that.
[~AHeise] I think we can not merge the benchmarks to the main repo :(
[~yunta] would you like to start the discussion on dev mailing list about
creating new repository for the benchmarks?
> Make flink-benchmark align with different releases of Flink
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-16850
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16850
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Benchmarks
> Affects Versions: 1.10.0
> Reporter: Yun Tang
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently, [flink-benchmark|https://github.com/dataArtisans/flink-benchmarks]
> does not have any releases to align with release branches of Flink. Just
> change the {{flink.version}} when executing benchmark is not enough as
> {{flink-benchmark}} always use the latset interfaces which might not existed
> in previous Flink versions. Take FLINK-15222 for example, this let
> {{flink-benchmark}} to use new version of interface which is only existed
> after Flink-1.11
> I think we could also let {{flink-benchmark}} to have releases or at least
> specific branch to align with releases of Flink.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
