Gabor Gevay created FLINK-3166:
----------------------------------
Summary: The first program in ObjectReuseITCase has the wrong
expected result, and it succeeds
Key: FLINK-3166
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3166
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Gabor Gevay
Priority: Critical
The first program in ObjectReuseITCase has the following input:
a,1
a,2
a,3
a,4
a,50
There is a groupBy on field 0, and then a reduce, so the result should be
1+2+3+4+50 = 60. But the hardcoded expected result is 100, and running the
Flink program also produces this.
The problem is caused my mismatched assumptions between
ReduceCombineDriver.sortAndCombine and the ReduceFunction in the test about
object reuse rules of ReduceFunctions:
ReduceCombineDriver.sortAndCombine has the following comment:
"The user function is expected to return the first input as the result."
While the ReduceFunction in the test is modifying and returning the second
input. (And the second program in the test also has the same problem.)
I can't find the assumption that is stated in the comment in any documentation.
For example, the javadoc of ReduceFunction should make the user aware of this.
Or, alternatively, the code of the driver should be modified to not make this
assumption. I'm not sure which solution is better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
