danny0405 commented on a change in pull request #11568: [FLINK-16779][table] 
Add RAW type support in DDL and functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11568#discussion_r405221893
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
flink-table/flink-table-planner-blink/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/table/planner/calcite/FlinkTypeFactory.scala
 ##########
 @@ -484,6 +493,9 @@ object FlinkTypeFactory {
       // CURSOR for UDTF case, whose type info will never be used, just a 
placeholder
       case CURSOR => new TypeInformationRawType[Nothing](new NothingTypeInfo)
 
+      case null if relDataType.isInstanceOf[RawRelDataType] =>
 
 Review comment:
   If a type can be used in all kinds of SQL contexts directly, it is a SQL 
type, so the `RawRelDataType` should extend `AbstractSqlType` instead, as for 
the type name.
   
   I'm not sure if a `RAW` type can has precision, either `SqlTypeName.ANY` or 
`SqlTypeName.OTHER` is fine for me, the precision constraint for type name is 
mainly used for sanity check when creating type instances in 
`RelDataTypeFactory`, Flink has it's own logic for creating this type, so this 
is not a problem.
   
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to