WeiZhong94 commented on a change in pull request #11884:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/11884#discussion_r414255081
##########
File path:
flink-table/flink-table-api-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/table/catalog/FunctionCatalog.java
##########
@@ -194,22 +194,32 @@ public void registerCatalogFunction(
UnresolvedIdentifier unresolvedIdentifier,
Class<? extends UserDefinedFunction> functionClass,
boolean ignoreIfExists) {
- final ObjectIdentifier identifier =
catalogManager.qualifyIdentifier(unresolvedIdentifier);
- final ObjectIdentifier normalizedIdentifier =
FunctionIdentifier.normalizeObjectIdentifier(identifier);
try {
UserDefinedFunctionHelper.validateClass(functionClass);
} catch (Throwable t) {
throw new ValidationException(
String.format(
"Could not register catalog function
'%s' due to implementation errors.",
- identifier.asSummaryString()),
+
catalogManager.qualifyIdentifier(unresolvedIdentifier).asSummaryString()),
t);
}
- final Catalog catalog =
catalogManager.getCatalog(normalizedIdentifier.getCatalogName())
- .orElseThrow(IllegalStateException::new);
- final ObjectPath path = identifier.toObjectPath();
+ final CatalogFunction catalogFunction = new CatalogFunctionImpl(
Review comment:
The initial reason of this change is provide an approach in
`FunctionCatalog` to register Python CatalogFunction. But it seems not
necessary now because the upper layer accesses the Catalog object directly.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
