wangyang0918 opened a new pull request #12003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12003
<!--
*Thank you very much for contributing to Apache Flink - we are happy that
you want to help us improve Flink. To help the community review your
contribution in the best possible way, please go through the checklist below,
which will get the contribution into a shape in which it can be best reviewed.*
*Please understand that we do not do this to make contributions to Flink a
hassle. In order to uphold a high standard of quality for code contributions,
while at the same time managing a large number of contributions, we need
contributors to prepare the contributions well, and give reviewers enough
contextual information for the review. Please also understand that
contributions that do not follow this guide will take longer to review and thus
typically be picked up with lower priority by the community.*
## Contribution Checklist
- Make sure that the pull request corresponds to a [JIRA
issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/FLINK/issues). Exceptions are
made for typos in JavaDoc or documentation files, which need no JIRA issue.
- Name the pull request in the form "[FLINK-XXXX] [component] Title of the
pull request", where *FLINK-XXXX* should be replaced by the actual issue
number. Skip *component* if you are unsure about which is the best component.
Typo fixes that have no associated JIRA issue should be named following
this pattern: `[hotfix] [docs] Fix typo in event time introduction` or
`[hotfix] [javadocs] Expand JavaDoc for PuncuatedWatermarkGenerator`.
- Fill out the template below to describe the changes contributed by the
pull request. That will give reviewers the context they need to do the review.
- Make sure that the change passes the automated tests, i.e., `mvn clean
verify` passes. You can set up Travis CI to do that following [this
guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/contribute-code.html#open-a-pull-request).
- Each pull request should address only one issue, not mix up code from
multiple issues.
- Each commit in the pull request has a meaningful commit message
(including the JIRA id)
- Once all items of the checklist are addressed, remove the above text and
this checklist, leaving only the filled out template below.
**(The sections below can be removed for hotfixes of typos)**
-->
## What is the purpose of the change
The PR is to support application mode for the Kubernetes. The start command
is very similar to Yarn integration just like following. Non-ha and HA mode
both should work as expected.
```
flink run-application -t kubernetes-application \
-Dkubernetes.cluster-id=${CLUSTER_ID} \
-Dkubernetes.container.image=${FLINK_IMAGE_NAME} \
-Djobmanager.memory.process.size=2048m \
-Dkubernetes.jobmanager.cpu=1 \
-Dkubernetes.taskmanager.cpu=1 \
-Dkubernetes.rest-service.exposed.type=NodePort \
local:///opt/flink/examples/streaming/WindowJoin.jar
```
How to specify user jar and classpath?
In native K8s application, when the jobmanager is launched, all the user jar
and dependencies have already existed(e.g. built in the image, or downloaded by
init-container).
The user jar should be specified with schema `local://`, which means it
exists in the jobmanager side.
For the dependencies, users could put it in the `$FLINK_HOME/usrlib`
directory, the jars located in the usrlib will be automatically added to the
user classpath. They could also specify the user classpath via `-C/--classpath`
of `flink run-application` command.
## Brief change log
* Make flink run-application could support local schema
* Support application mode for kubernetes
* Add e2e tests for Kubernetes application mode
* Set log4j for Kubernetes cli
## Verifying this change
* The changes is covered by new added UT and e2e
test(`test_kubernetes_application.sh`)
* Manually test in a real K8s cluster for the non-HA and HA mode
## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
- Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / **no**)
- The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with
`@Public(Evolving)`: (yes / **no**)
- The serializers: (yes / **no** / don't know)
- The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / **no**
/ don't know)
- Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (**yes** / no /
don't know)
- The S3 file system connector: (yes / **no** / don't know)
## Documentation
- Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (**yes** / no)
- If yes, how is the feature documented? (will update the doc in a
separate ticket)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
