[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17117407#comment-17117407
 ] 

godfrey he commented on FLINK-17953:
------------------------------------

blink planner does not require the order filed must be time attribute type for 
batch sql. I think we can remove the validation and let the specific planner do 
the validation.

> OverWindow doesn't support to order by non-time attribute in batch mode for 
> Table API program
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17953
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17953
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Table SQL / Planner
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0, 1.10.0, 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Dian Fu
>            Priority: Major
>
> For a simple batch job tested in blink planner:
> {code:java}
> INSERT INTO results
> SELECT id, sum(sales)
> OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY ts ROWS BETWEEN 2 PRECEDING AND 0 FOLLOWING)
> FROM input
> {code}
> It could pass if written in SQL. However, if we rewrite it in Table API, it 
> will throw the following exception:
> {code:java}
> py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling 
> o85.select.py4j.protocol.Py4JJavaError: An error occurred while calling 
> o85.select.: org.apache.flink.table.api.ValidationException: Ordering must be 
> defined on a time attribute. at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.expressions.PlannerTypeInferenceUtilImpl.validateArguments(PlannerTypeInferenceUtilImpl.java:112)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.planner.expressions.PlannerTypeInferenceUtilImpl.runTypeInference(PlannerTypeInferenceUtilImpl.java:71)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule$ResolvingCallVisitor.runLegacyTypeInference(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:218)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule$ResolvingCallVisitor.lambda$visit$2(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:134)
>  at java.util.Optional.orElseGet(Optional.java:267) at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule$ResolvingCallVisitor.visit(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:134)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule$ResolvingCallVisitor.visit(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:89)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.ApiExpressionVisitor.visit(ApiExpressionVisitor.java:39)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.UnresolvedCallExpression.accept(UnresolvedCallExpression.java:132)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule$ResolvingCallVisitor.visit(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:124)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule$ResolvingCallVisitor.visit(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:89)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.ApiExpressionVisitor.visit(ApiExpressionVisitor.java:39)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.UnresolvedCallExpression.accept(UnresolvedCallExpression.java:132)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.lambda$apply$0(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:83)
>  at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$7$1.accept(ReferencePipeline.java:267) 
> at 
> java.util.ArrayList$ArrayListSpliterator.forEachRemaining(ArrayList.java:1374)
>  at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:481) at 
> java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(AbstractPipeline.java:471) 
> at java.util.stream.ReduceOps$ReduceOp.evaluateSequential(ReduceOps.java:708) 
> at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(AbstractPipeline.java:234) at 
> java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.collect(ReferencePipeline.java:499) at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.rules.ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.apply(ResolveCallByArgumentsRule.java:84)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.ExpressionResolver.lambda$null$1(ExpressionResolver.java:211)
>  at java.util.function.Function.lambda$andThen$1(Function.java:88) at 
> org.apache.flink.table.expressions.resolver.ExpressionResolver.resolve(ExpressionResolver.java:178)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.operations.utils.OperationTreeBuilder.projectInternal(OperationTreeBuilder.java:191)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.operations.utils.OperationTreeBuilder.project(OperationTreeBuilder.java:170)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.table.api.internal.TableImpl$OverWindowedTableImpl.select(TableImpl.java:953)
>  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) 
> at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at 
> org.apache.flink.api.python.shaded.py4j.reflection.MethodInvoker.invoke(MethodInvoker.java:244)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.api.python.shaded.py4j.reflection.ReflectionEngine.invoke(ReflectionEngine.java:357)
>  at org.apache.flink.api.python.shaded.py4j.Gateway.invoke(Gateway.java:282) 
> at 
> org.apache.flink.api.python.shaded.py4j.commands.AbstractCommand.invokeMethod(AbstractCommand.java:132)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.api.python.shaded.py4j.commands.CallCommand.execute(CallCommand.java:79)
>  at 
> org.apache.flink.api.python.shaded.py4j.GatewayConnection.run(GatewayConnection.java:238)
>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to