[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17132997#comment-17132997
]
Zhijiang commented on FLINK-17182:
----------------------------------
I think I should review this PR today to save some efforts for testing
stability, although this issue is not a blocker for release. :)
> RemoteInputChannelTest.testConcurrentOnSenderBacklogAndRecycle fail on azure
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17182
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17182
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Network
> Affects Versions: 1.11.0
> Reporter: Dawid Wysakowicz
> Assignee: Yun Gao
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available, test-stability
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> https://dev.azure.com/rmetzger/Flink/_build/results?buildId=7546&view=logs&j=0da23115-68bb-5dcd-192c-bd4c8adebde1&t=d2c1c472-9d7b-5913-b8e4-461f3092fb7a
> {code}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 21, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
> 3.943 s <<< FAILURE! - in
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.consumer.RemoteInputChannelTest
> [ERROR]
> testConcurrentOnSenderBacklogAndRecycle(org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.consumer.RemoteInputChannelTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.011 s <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: There should be 248 buffers available in channel.
> expected:<248> but was:<238>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
> at
> org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.partition.consumer.RemoteInputChannelTest.testConcurrentOnSenderBacklogAndRecycle(RemoteInputChannelTest.java:869)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
