[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17180388#comment-17180388
 ] 

Yun Gao commented on FLINK-18695:
---------------------------------

Hi, I have finished the tests with the current master branch, and the detail is 
in [this 
doc|https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DiUjs_ft9qMSElhdDMkJlj_cIltYeghg4JKqnk3weCA/edit?usp=sharing].
 Roughly, SSL would cause more memory consumption with both JDK and OPENSSL 
provider, and the JDK provide seems to may cause memory consumption that cannot 
be ignored. 

In the next, I would also test the situation if JDK provider is changed to heap 
buffer. I would finish the tests as soon as possible in the next several days. 

> Allow NettyBufferPool to allocate heap buffers
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-18695
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18695
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Network
>            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
>            Assignee: Yun Gao
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> in 4.1.43 netty made a change to their SslHandler to always use heap buffers 
> for JDK SSLEngine implementations, to avoid an additional memory copy.
> However, our {{NettyBufferPool}} forbids heap buffer allocations.
> We will either have to allow heap buffer allocations, or create a custom 
> SslHandler implementation that does not use heap buffers (although this seems 
> ill-adviced?).
> /cc [~sewen] [~uce] [~NicoK] [~zjwang] [~pnowojski]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to