[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3179?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15150343#comment-15150343
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3179:
---------------------------------------

Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1553#discussion_r53151692
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-optimizer/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/optimizer/operators/GroupReduceWithCombineProperties.java
 ---
    @@ -87,19 +92,39 @@ public DriverStrategy getStrategy() {
                return DriverStrategy.SORTED_GROUP_REDUCE;
        }
     
    -   @Override
        public SingleInputPlanNode instantiate(Channel in, SingleInputNode 
node) {
                if (in.getShipStrategy() == ShipStrategyType.FORWARD) {
                        // adjust a sort (changes grouping, so it must be for 
this driver to combining sort
    -                   if (in.getLocalStrategy() == LocalStrategy.SORT) {
    -                           if 
(!in.getLocalStrategyKeys().isValidUnorderedPrefix(this.keys)) {
    -                                   throw new RuntimeException("Bug: 
Inconsistent sort for group strategy.");
    +                   if(in.getSource().getOptimizerNode() instanceof 
PartitionNode) {
    +                           // Inject a combiner before the partition node
    +                           Channel toCombiner = new 
Channel(in.getSource());
    --- End diff --
    
    bad variable name. This channel will not lead to the combiner.


> Combiner is not injected if Reduce or GroupReduce input is explicitly 
> partitioned
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3179
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3179
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Optimizer
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.1
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: ramkrishna.s.vasudevan
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.0.0, 0.10.2
>
>
> The optimizer does not inject a combiner if the input of a Reducer or 
> GroupReducer is explicitly partitioned as in the following example
> {code}
> DataSet<Tuple2<String,Integer>> words = ...
> DataSet<Tuple2<String,Integer>> counts = words
>   .partitionByHash(0)
>   .groupBy(0)
>   .sum(1);
> {code}
> Explicit partitioning can be useful to enforce partitioning on a subset of 
> keys or to use a different partitioning method (custom or range partitioning).
> This issue should be fixed by changing the {{instantiate()}} methods of the 
> {{ReduceProperties}} and {{GroupReduceWithCombineProperties}} classes such 
> that a combine is injected in front of a {{PartitionPlanNode}} if it is the 
> input of a Reduce or GroupReduce operator. This should only happen, if the 
> Reducer is the only successor of the Partition operator.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to