rkhachatryan commented on a change in pull request #13040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13040#discussion_r493490368



##########
File path: 
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/checkpoint/ZooKeeperCompletedCheckpointStoreITCase.java
##########
@@ -283,6 +286,54 @@ public void testConcurrentCheckpointOperations() throws 
Exception {
                recoveredTestCheckpoint.awaitDiscard();
        }
 
+       /**
+        * FLINK-17073 tests that there is no request triggered when there are 
too many checkpoints
+        * waiting to clean and that it resumes when the number of waiting 
checkpoints as gone below
+        * the threshold.
+        *
+        */
+       @Test
+       public void testChekpointingPausesAndResumeWhenTooManyCheckpoints() 
throws Exception{
+               ManualClock clock = new ManualClock();
+               clock.advanceTime(1, TimeUnit.DAYS);
+               int maxCleaningCheckpoints = 1;
+               CheckpointsCleaner checkpointsCleaner = new 
CheckpointsCleaner();
+               CheckpointRequestDecider checkpointRequestDecider =  new 
CheckpointRequestDecider(maxCleaningCheckpoints, unused ->{}, clock, 1, new 
AtomicInteger(0)::get, checkpointsCleaner::getNumberOfCheckpointsToClean);
+
+               final int maxCheckpointsToRetain = 1;
+               Executors.PausableThreadPoolExecutor executor = 
Executors.pausableExecutor();
+               ZooKeeperCompletedCheckpointStore checkpointStore = 
createCompletedCheckpoints(maxCheckpointsToRetain, executor);
+
+               //pause the executor to pause checkpoints cleaning, to allow 
assertions
+               executor.pause();
+
+               int nbCheckpointsToInject = 3;
+               for (int i = 1; i <= nbCheckpointsToInject; i++) {
+                       // add checkpoints to clean
+                       TestCompletedCheckpoint completedCheckpoint = new 
TestCompletedCheckpoint(new JobID(), i,
+                               i, Collections.emptyMap(), 
CheckpointProperties.forCheckpoint(CheckpointRetentionPolicy.RETAIN_ON_FAILURE),
+                               checkpointsCleaner::cleanCheckpoint);
+                       checkpointStore.addCheckpoint(completedCheckpoint);
+               }
+
+               Thread.sleep(100L); // give time to submit checkpoints for 
cleaning
+
+               int nbCheckpointsSubmittedForCleaningByCheckpointStore = 
nbCheckpointsToInject - maxCheckpointsToRetain;
+               
assertEquals(nbCheckpointsSubmittedForCleaningByCheckpointStore, 
checkpointsCleaner.getNumberOfCheckpointsToClean());

Review comment:
       I find `CountDownLatch` approach worse compared to `while` loops because:
   1. it's more fragile because ZKStore can submit several `Runnable`s
   1. I need to follow when latches are triggered
   1. with a new Executor added, it's more complex
   
   For 1, we should probably use `triggerAll` instead of `trigger`. But still 
it's unclear what should be the counts in latches.
   For 3, I think executor could provide methods like `awaitSubmitted(count)` 
and `awaitAllTriggered`.
   
   But I'd still prefer a loop.
   
   (please unresolve this thread)




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to