GitHub user mxm opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1741

    [FLINK-3544] Introduce ResourceManager component

    So far the JobManager has been the central instance which is responsible 
for resource management and allocation.
    
    While thinking about how to integrate Mesos support in Flink, people from 
the Flink community realized that it would be nice to delegate resource 
allocation to a dedicated process. This process may run independently of the 
JobManager which is a requirement for proper integration of cluster allocation 
frameworks like Mesos.
    
    This has led to the idea of creating a new component called the 
ResourceManager. Its task is to allocate and maintain resources requested by 
the JobManager. The ResourceManager has a very abstract notion of resources.
    
    Initially, we thought we could make the ResourceManager deal with resource 
allocation and the registration/supervision of the TaskManagers. However, this 
approach proved to add unnecessary complexity to the runtime. Registration 
state of TaskManagers had to be kept in sync at both the JobManager and the 
ResourceManager.
    
    That's why @StephanEwen and me changed the ResourceManager's role to simply 
deal with the resource acquisition. The TaskManagers still register with the 
JobManager which informs the ResourceManager about the successful registration 
of a TaskManager. The ResourceManager may inform the JobManager of failed 
TaskManagers. Due to the insight which the ResourceManager has in the resource 
health, it may detect failed TaskManagers much earlier than the heartbeat-based 
monitoring of the JobManager.
    
    At this stage, the ResourceManager is an optional component. That means the 
JobManager doesn't depend on the ResourceManager as long as it has enough 
resources to perform the computation. All bookkeeping is performed by the 
JobManager. When the ResourceManager connects to the JobManager, it receives 
the current resources, i.e. task manager instances, and allocates more 
containers if necessary. The JobManager adjusts the number of containers 
through the SetWorkerPoolSize method.
    
    In standalone mode, the ResourceManager may be deactivated or simply use 
the StandaloneResourceManager which does practically nothing because we don't 
need to allocate resources in standalone mode.
    
    In YARN mode, the ResourceManager takes care of communicating with the Yarn 
resource manager. When containers fail, it informs the JobManager and tries to 
allocate new containers. The ResourceManager runs as an actor within the same 
actor system as the JobManager. It could, however, also run independently. The 
independent mode would be the default behavior for Mesos where the framework 
master is expected to just deal with resource allocation.
    
    The attached figures depict the message flow between ResourceManager, 
JobManager, and TaskManager.
    
    
[ResourceManagerSketch.pdf](https://github.com/apache/flink/files/151425/ResourceManagerSketch.pdf)


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/mxm/flink resourceManager-v2-squashed

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1741.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #1741
    
----
commit 9a32d5caff88b63566365637e6f6176f5bbe83a7
Author: Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
Date:   2016-02-09T10:20:42Z

    [FLINK-3544][runtime] Introduce ResourceManager component

commit 26d1b77b4157e001d9fbdea1fd214f9f31c14bbb
Author: Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
Date:   2016-02-24T08:20:42Z

    [FLINK-3545][yarn] integrate ResourceManager support

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to