[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jark Wu updated FLINK-18654:
----------------------------
    Component/s: Table SQL / Ecosystem

> Correct missleading documentation in "Partitioned Scan" section of JDBC 
> connector
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-18654
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18654
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Connectors / JDBC, Documentation, Table SQL / Ecosystem
>    Affects Versions: 1.11.0
>            Reporter: Jark Wu
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.12.0, 1.11.4
>
>
> In 
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/dev/table/connectors/jdbc.html#partitioned-scan
> > Notice that scan.partition.lower-bound and scan.partition.upper-bound are 
> > just used to decide the partition stride, not for filtering the rows in 
> > table. So all rows in the table will be partitioned and returned.
> The "not for filtering the rows in table" is not correct, actually, if 
> partition bounds is defined, it only scans rows in the bound range. 
> Besides, maybe it would be better to add some practice suggestion, for 
> example, 
> "If it is a batch job, I think it also doable to get the max and min value 
> first before submitting the flink job."



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to