rkhachatryan opened a new pull request #14218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14218


   ## What is the purpose of the change
   
   A check was added recently that the 
`RemoteInputChannel.lastBarrierSequenceNumber` was not overwritten by a newer 
barrier.
   The check itself is valid, however the task  shouldn't fail in that case.
   
   Relying on the assumption of at most one **active** unaligned checkpoint at 
a time, the older checkpoint should simply be declined.
   Cleanup is needed for (all) channels, barrier controller, handler and 
checkpoint writer. Therefore, abort in `SingleCheckpointBarrierHandler` should 
be used.
   
   ## Verifying this change
   
   This change is already covered by existing test: 
`UnalignedCheckpointITCase`.`parallel pipeline with mixed channels, p = 20`
   
   ## Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
   
     - Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
     - The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with 
`@Public(Evolving)`: no
     - The serializers: no
     - The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
     - Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its 
components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no
     - The S3 file system connector: no
   
   ## Documentation
   
     - Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
     - If yes, how is the feature documented? no
   


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to