[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17291751#comment-17291751
]
Kezhu Wang commented on FLINK-20658:
------------------------------------
[~jark] Sorry for so late response. I confirmed my previous suspect. I plan to
following procedure:
# Filter {{DriverManager.getDrivers()}} by {{driverName}}.
# Fallback to {{Class.forName(driverName, true,
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader())}} and {{Class.newInstance}}.
# Cache filtered/created {{Driver}} in above phases.
# Enable {{SimpleJdbcConnectionProviderTest.testEstablishDriverConnection}}.
As a side effect, no jdbc compliant driver(eg. not registered in
{{DriverManager}}) will work. I think this could be useful in certain cases(eg.
testing or reusing same url without conflict with existing driver). I could
write tests to assert this behavior.
[~jark] What do you think ?
> Make sure jdbc connection is established by target driver
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-20658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20658
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Connectors / JDBC, Table SQL / Ecosystem
> Affects Versions: 1.13.0
> Reporter: Kezhu Wang
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.13.0
>
>
> Currently, {{SimpleJdbcConnectionProvider.getConnection}} may return
> connection established by driver different from {{jdbcOptions.driverName}} if
> there are multiple driver implementations for same jdbc url exist in class
> path.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)