[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17294247#comment-17294247
]
xiaogang zhou commented on FLINK-21543:
---------------------------------------
[~yunta] As level compaction can cause too many compaction in every snapshot,
our job is not applicable in that situation as compaction caused all the cpu
resources.
Our situation is 1 write and 1 read after... we do not need merge files. in the
flink configuration, the fifo is mentioned.
for FIFO compaction, normally it works fine. But when recover from checkpoint,
I found the issue, and I attached the rocksdb log .
I think in our case, the fifo is the only way. can you please review?
> when using FIFO compaction, I found sst being deleted on the first checkpoint
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-21543
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21543
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / State Backends
> Reporter: xiaogang zhou
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LOG (2)
>
>
> 2021/03/01-18:51:01.202049 7f59042fc700 (Original Log Time
> 2021/03/01-18:51:01.200883) [/compaction/compaction_picker_fifo.cc:107]
> [_timer_state/processing_user-timers] FIFO compaction: picking file 1710 with
> creation time 0 for deletion
>
> the configuration is like
> currentOptions.setCompactionStyle(getCompactionStyle());
> currentOptions.setLevel0FileNumCompactionTrigger(8);
> //
> currentOptions.setMaxTableFilesSizeFIFO(MemorySize.parse("2gb").getBytes());
> CompactionOptionsFIFO compactionOptionsFIFO = new CompactionOptionsFIFO();
>
> compactionOptionsFIFO.setMaxTableFilesSize(MemorySize.parse("8gb").getBytes());
> compactionOptionsFIFO.setAllowCompaction(true);
>
> the rocksdb version is
> <dependency>
> <groupId>io.github.myasuka</groupId>
> <artifactId>frocksdbjni</artifactId>
> <version>6.10.2-ververica-3.0</version>
> </dependency>
>
> I think the problem is caused by tableproperty is lost by snapshot. Can any
> one suggest how i can skip this problem?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)