[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15246167#comment-15246167
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3477:
---------------------------------------

Github user greghogan commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1517#discussion_r60104097
  
    --- Diff: 
flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/operators/base/ReduceOperatorBase.java
 ---
    @@ -54,6 +54,32 @@
     @Internal
     public class ReduceOperatorBase<T, FT extends ReduceFunction<T>> extends 
SingleInputOperator<T, T, FT> {
     
    +   /**
    +    * An enumeration of hints, optionally usable to tell the system 
exactly how to execute the combiner phase
    +    * of a reduce.
    +    * (Note: The final reduce phase (after combining) is currently always 
executed by a sort-based strategy.)
    +    */
    +   public enum CombineHint {
    --- End diff --
    
    Should we consider an additional flag {{CombineHint.NONE}} for cases where 
the expected number of duplicate keys is relatively small (i.e. FLINK-3279)?


> Add hash-based combine strategy for ReduceFunction
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3477
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Local Runtime
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Gabor Gevay
>
> This issue is about adding a hash-based combine strategy for ReduceFunctions.
> The interface of the {{reduce()}} method is as follows:
> {code}
> public T reduce(T v1, T v2)
> {code}
> Input type and output type are identical and the function returns only a 
> single value. A Reduce function is incrementally applied to compute a final 
> aggregated value. This allows to hold the preaggregated value in a hash-table 
> and update it with each function call. 
> The hash-based strategy requires special implementation of an in-memory hash 
> table. The hash table should support in place updates of elements (if the 
> updated value has the same size as the new value) but also appending updates 
> with invalidation of the old value (if the binary length of the new value 
> differs). The hash table needs to be able to evict and emit all elements if 
> it runs out-of-memory.
> We should also add {{HASH}} and {{SORT}} compiler hints to 
> {{DataSet.reduce()}} and {{Grouping.reduce()}} to allow users to pick the 
> execution strategy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to