[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konstantin Knauf updated FLINK-17122:
-------------------------------------
    Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Wish)

As part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22029 the "Wish" issue 
type will be dropped. I changed this one to "Improvement" instead.

> Support InputSelectable and BoundedMultiInput operators with checkpointing
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-17122
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17122
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Checkpointing, Runtime / Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.2, 1.10.0
>            Reporter: Piotr Nowojski
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently when user defined some {{InputSelectable}} or {{BoundedMultiInput}} 
> operators, checkpointing is not supported. Main problem is the that 
> combination of {{InputSelectable}} and barrier alignment can lead to 
> deadlocks (checkpoint barrier stuck on not selected channel). 
> Problem could be somehow mitigated via unaligned checkpoints (FLINK-14551), 
> but not fully. Even with unaligned checkpoints, checkpoint barriers can be 
> stuck in the job graph if there is a {{flatMap}} operator (or non {{flatMap}} 
> operator but if records are spanning multiple buffers), blocked in the middle 
> of processing by some down stream input selection. In such case we are not 
> able to perform unaligned checkpoint.
> Potential solution could be using persistent communication channels or 
> detecting before mentioned situations and avoid the dead lock by spilling 
> excess data.
> As most of the problems are with input selections that are randomly flipping, 
> there might be some partial solution for more trivial cases, like reading one 
> side of an input fully before the other.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to