[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15254051#comment-15254051
]
Greg Hogan commented on FLINK-2715:
-----------------------------------
I happened to include some triangle benchmarks in the pull request for
FLINK-3768. Adding a flag for {{GSATriangleCount}} was simple. Testing on an
AWS ec2.8xlarge (36 vcores, 60 GiB), what took {{TriangleListing}} 5s and
{{TriangleEnumerator}} 7s crashed Flink at 6m3s with {{GSATriangleCount}}.
Orkut and Friendster are 100x and 2000x larger than RMat s16e16 so running
these benchmarks with GSA or SG does not look feasible with the current
algorithms.
I do agree that for overlapping algorithms in Gelly it would be nice to present
users a performance comparison. Thoughts, [~vkalavri]?
> Benchmark Triangle Count methods
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-2715
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2715
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Gelly
> Affects Versions: 0.10.0
> Reporter: Andra Lungu
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: starter
>
> Once FLINK-2714 is addressed, it would be nice to have a set of benchmarks
> that test the efficiency of the DataSet, GSA and vertex-centric versions.
> This means running the three examples on a cluster environment using various
> graph DataSets. For instance, SNAP's Orkut and Friendster networks
> (https://snap.stanford.edu/data/).
> The results produced by the experiments should then be reported in the Gelly
> docs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
