[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-21350:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: stale-major  (was: )

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Major but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 30 days. I have gone ahead and added a "stale-major" to the issue". If this 
ticket is a Major, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> ParquetInputFormat incorrectly interprets timestamps encoded in microseconds 
> as timestamps encoded in milliseconds
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-21350
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21350
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Formats (JSON, Avro, Parquet, ORC, SequenceFile)
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0, 1.12.1
>            Reporter: Jeffrey Charles
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: stale-major
>
> Given a parquet file with a schema that has a field with a physical type of 
> INT64 and a logical type of TIMESTAMP_MICROS, all of the ParquetInputFormat 
> sub-classes deserialize the timestamp as tens of thousands of years in the 
> future.
> Looking at the code in 
> [https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-1.12.1/flink-formats/flink-parquet/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/formats/parquet/utils/RowConverter.java#L326,]
>  it looks to me like the row converter is interpreting the field value as if 
> it contained milliseconds and not microseconds. Specifically both millisecond 
> and microsecond processing share the same code path to instantiate a 
> java.sql.timestamp which takes a millisecond value in its constructor and the 
> microsecond case statement is passing it a value in microseconds. I tested a 
> change locally where I divide the value by 1000 in the microseconds case 
> statement and that results in a timestamp with the expected value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to