[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15297815#comment-15297815
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3941:
---------------------------------------
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2025#discussion_r64338444
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/batch/table/UnionITCase.java
---
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ public UnionITCase(TestExecutionMode mode) {
}
@Test
- public void testUnion() throws Exception {
+ public void testUnionAll() throws Exception {
--- End diff --
Actually, I would completely remove the whole Java `UnionITCase.java` file.
It tests exactly the same methods as the Scala tests (no expression parsing
involved).
> Add support for UNION (with duplicate elimination)
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-3941
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3941
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Table API
> Affects Versions: 1.1.0
> Reporter: Fabian Hueske
> Assignee: Yijie Shen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, only UNION ALL is supported by Table API and SQL.
> UNION (with duplicate elimination) can be supported by applying a
> {{DataSet.distinct()}} after the union on all fields. This issue includes:
> - Extending {{DataSetUnion}}
> - Relaxing {{DataSetUnionRule}} to translated non-all unions.
> - Extend the Table API with union() method.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
