[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konstantin Knauf reopened FLINK-13638:
--------------------------------------

Re-opening in accordance with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23206.

> Refactor RemoteChannelStateChecker#isProducerConsumerReadyOrAbortConsumption 
> to return result action
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-13638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13638
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Network
>    Affects Versions: 1.9.0, 1.10.0
>            Reporter: Andrey Zagrebin
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-closed
>
> RemoteChannelStateChecker#isProducerConsumerReadyOrAbortConsumption either 
> triggers some action (fail or cancel) or returns a decision (trigger new 
> partition check or not). It would be more symmetric if this class would not 
> trigger any action but only return a decision what to do:
>  
> {code:java}
> enum Action {
>   FAIL(Throwable cause),
>   CANCEL(String msg),
>   TRIGGER_PARTITION_CHECK, NOOP
> }
> {code}
>  
> Then the caller would be responsible for making the action. That way this 
> class would only need access to 
> responseHandle{{.getProducerExecutionState()}} and not responseHandle{{ 
> }}itself.
> From PR discussion 
> [https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/8463#discussion_r288290783]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to