[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17390389#comment-17390389
 ] 

Dawid Wysakowicz commented on FLINK-20683:
------------------------------------------

https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=21182&view=logs&j=21408240-6569-5a01-c099-3adfe83ce651&t=b2761bb8-3852-5a0d-bc43-6a1d327b63cb&l=7852

> TaskSlotTableImplTest failed with "The slot timeout should have been 
> deactivated."
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-20683
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20683
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Coordination
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0, 1.13.0
>            Reporter: Huang Xingbo
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: test-stability
>
> [https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=11071&view=logs&j=f0ac5c25-1168-55a5-07ff-0e88223afed9&t=0dbaca5d-7c38-52e6-f4fe-2fb69ccb3ada]
> {code:java}
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8133545Z [ERROR] 
> testTryMarkSlotActiveDeactivatesSlotTimeout(org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.slot.TaskSlotTableImplTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.082 s  <<< FAILURE!
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8135672Z java.lang.AssertionError: The slot timeout 
> should have been deactivated.
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8136417Z  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8137153Z  at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.slot.TaskSlotTableImplTest.runDeactivateSlotTimeoutTest(TaskSlotTableImplTest.java:344)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8138303Z  at 
> org.apache.flink.runtime.taskexecutor.slot.TaskSlotTableImplTest.testTryMarkSlotActiveDeactivatesSlotTimeout(TaskSlotTableImplTest.java:326)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8139195Z  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8139805Z  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8167569Z  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8168468Z  at 
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8169248Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8169942Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8170657Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8171359Z  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8171983Z  at 
> org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:55)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8172576Z  at 
> org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8173209Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8173834Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8174556Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8174994Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8175376Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8175782Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8176188Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8176576Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8176965Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8177326Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8177653Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8178104Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8178706Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8179223Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8179781Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8180169Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8180565Z  at 
> org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8180963Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:55)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8181435Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8181964Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8182468Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8182951Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8183446Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider.invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:158)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8183972Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8184666Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8185157Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)
> 2020-12-19T22:56:49.8185604Z  at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to