zentol commented on a change in pull request #17051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17051#discussion_r706021029
##########
File path:
flink-streaming-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/streaming/util/typeutils/FieldAccessorFactory.java
##########
@@ -38,6 +43,12 @@
@Internal
public class FieldAccessorFactory implements Serializable {
Review comment:
I haven't, no. Do you mean some form of
`TypeInformation#getFieldAccessor`?
If the removal wasn't planned then I would definitely go for that, but as is
it seems like the approach in the PR is less work?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
