[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-6472:
----------------------------------
    Labels: auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor  (was: 
auto-deprioritized-major)

I am the [Flink Jira Bot|https://github.com/apache/flink-jira-bot/] and I help 
the community manage its development. I see this issues has been marked as 
Minor but is unassigned and neither itself nor its Sub-Tasks have been updated 
for 180 days. I have gone ahead and marked it "stale-minor". If this ticket is 
still Minor, please either assign yourself or give an update. Afterwards, 
please remove the label or in 7 days the issue will be deprioritized.


> BoundedOutOfOrdernessTimestampExtractor does not bound out of orderliness
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-6472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6472
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: API / DataStream
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Elias Levy
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-major, stale-minor
>
> {{BoundedOutOfOrdernessTimestampExtractor}} attempts to emit watermarks that 
> lag behind the largest observed timestamp by a configurable time delta.  It 
> fails to so in some circumstances.
> The class extends {{AssignerWithPeriodicWatermarks}}, which generates 
> watermarks in periodic intervals.  The timer for this intervals is a 
> processing time timer.
> In circumstances where there is a rush of events (restarting Flink, unpausing 
> an upstream producer, loading events from a file, etc), many events with 
> timestamps much larger that what the configured bound would normally allow 
> will be sent downstream without a watermark.  This can have negative effects 
> downstream, as operators may be buffering the events waiting for a watermark 
> to process them, thus leading the memory growth and possible out-of-memory 
> conditions.
> It is probably best to have a bounded out of orderliness extractor that is 
> based on the punctuated timestamp extractor, so we can ensure that watermarks 
> are generated in a timely fashion in event time, with the addition of process 
> time timer to generate a watermark if there has been a lull in events, thus 
> also bounding the delay of generating a watermark in processing time. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to