[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Flink Jira Bot updated FLINK-20614:
-----------------------------------
      Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical auto-deprioritized-major 
auto-deprioritized-minor  (was: auto-deprioritized-critical 
auto-deprioritized-major stale-minor)
    Priority: Not a Priority  (was: Minor)

This issue was labeled "stale-minor" 7 days ago and has not received any 
updates so it is being deprioritized. If this ticket is actually Minor, please 
raise the priority and ask a committer to assign you the issue or revive the 
public discussion.


> Registered sql drivers not deregistered after task finished in session cluster
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-20614
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20614
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Connectors / JDBC, Runtime / Task
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0, 1.13.0
>            Reporter: Kezhu Wang
>            Priority: Not a Priority
>              Labels: auto-deprioritized-critical, auto-deprioritized-major, 
> auto-deprioritized-minor
>
> {{DriverManager}} keeps registered drivers in its internal data structures 
> which prevents they from gc after task finished. I confirm it in standalone 
> session cluster by observing that {{ChildFirstClassLoader}} could not be 
> reclaimed after several {{GC.run}}, it should exist in all session clusters.
> Tomcat documents 
> [this|https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat85/docs/jndi-datasource-examples-howto.html#DriverManager,_the_service_provider_mechanism_and_memory_leaks]
>  and fixes/circumvents this with 
> [JdbcLeakPrevention|https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/master/java/org/apache/catalina/loader/JdbcLeakPrevention.java#L30].
> Should we solve this in runtime ? Or treat it as connector and clients' 
> responsibility to solve it using 
> {{RuntimeContext.registerUserCodeClassLoaderReleaseHookIfAbsent}} or similar ?
> Personally, it would be nice to solve in runtime as a catch-all to avoid 
> memory-leaking and provide consistent behavior to clients cross per-job and 
> session mode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to