[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17489602#comment-17489602 ]
Danny Cranmer commented on FLINK-24229: --------------------------------------- [~Gusev] unfortunately I will not have the capacity to review this PR before 1.15 freeze. We have a bunch of outstanding work to do on KDS/KDF. I will update the 1.15 project plan to reflect this, maybe another committer can take a look? > [FLIP-171] DynamoDB implementation of Async Sink > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: FLINK-24229 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24229 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Connectors / Common > Reporter: Zichen Liu > Assignee: Zichen Liu > Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Fix For: 1.15.0 > > > h2. Motivation > *User stories:* > As a Flink user, I’d like to use DynamoDB as sink for my data pipeline. > *Scope:* > * Implement an asynchronous sink for DynamoDB by inheriting the > AsyncSinkBase class. The implementation can for now reside in its own module > in flink-connectors. > * Implement an asynchornous sink writer for DynamoDB by extending the > AsyncSinkWriter. The implementation must deal with failed requests and retry > them using the {{requeueFailedRequestEntry}} method. If possible, the > implementation should batch multiple requests (PutRecordsRequestEntry > objects) to Firehose for increased throughput. The implemented Sink Writer > will be used by the Sink class that will be created as part of this story. > * Java / code-level docs. > * End to end testing: add tests that hits a real AWS instance. (How to best > donate resources to the Flink project to allow this to happen?) > h2. References > More details to be found > [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)