echauchot commented on code in PR #19680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/19680#discussion_r874491149
##########
pom.xml:
##########
@@ -2134,6 +2134,7 @@ under the License.
<exclude>org.apache.flink.streaming.api.environment.LegacyLocalStreamEnvironment</exclude>
<exclude>org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.RichSinkFunction#invoke(java.lang.Object)</exclude>
<exclude>org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.SinkFunction</exclude>
+
<exclude>org.apache.flink.api.common.io.OutputFormat</exclude>
Review Comment:
yes as I said in the commit message as it was not user facing I proposed
this exception, but it is just to proposition. If it is not the correct move I
can definitely do otherwise. I just did not know what was acceptable: I mean
SinkFunctions for example were already in the exceptions.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
