echauchot commented on code in PR #19680: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/19680#discussion_r874491149
########## pom.xml: ########## @@ -2134,6 +2134,7 @@ under the License. <exclude>org.apache.flink.streaming.api.environment.LegacyLocalStreamEnvironment</exclude> <exclude>org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.RichSinkFunction#invoke(java.lang.Object)</exclude> <exclude>org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.SinkFunction</exclude> + <exclude>org.apache.flink.api.common.io.OutputFormat</exclude> Review Comment: yes as I said in the commit message as it was not user facing I proposed this exception, but it is just to proposition. If it is not the correct move I can definitely do otherwise. I just did not know what was acceptable: I mean SinkFunctions for example were already in the exceptions. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org