[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17542386#comment-17542386
]
Danny Cranmer commented on FLINK-24229:
---------------------------------------
[~martijnvisser] makes sense. Thanks I will do this
> [FLIP-171] DynamoDB implementation of Async Sink
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-24229
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-24229
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Connectors / Common
> Reporter: Zichen Liu
> Assignee: Yuri Gusev
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> h2. Motivation
> *User stories:*
> As a Flink user, I’d like to use DynamoDB as sink for my data pipeline.
> *Scope:*
> * Implement an asynchronous sink for DynamoDB by inheriting the
> AsyncSinkBase class. The implementation can for now reside in its own module
> in flink-connectors.
> * Implement an asynchornous sink writer for DynamoDB by extending the
> AsyncSinkWriter. The implementation must deal with failed requests and retry
> them using the {{requeueFailedRequestEntry}} method. If possible, the
> implementation should batch multiple requests (PutRecordsRequestEntry
> objects) to Firehose for increased throughput. The implemented Sink Writer
> will be used by the Sink class that will be created as part of this story.
> * Java / code-level docs.
> * End to end testing: add tests that hits a real AWS instance. (How to best
> donate resources to the Flink project to allow this to happen?)
> h2. References
> More details to be found
> [https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)
