[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17554393#comment-17554393
 ] 

Yun Tang commented on FLINK-28065:
----------------------------------

[~Tommmmmm] already assigned to you, please go ahead.

> A never reached code in ProcessMemoryUtils Class
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-28065
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28065
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Runtime / Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>            Reporter: zhuyufeng
>            Assignee: zhuyufeng
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The main logic of *sanityCheckTotalProcessMemory* method in 
> ProcessMemoryUtils Class will {color:#FF0000}never be executed{color}.
>  
> this is reason:
> In *deriveJvmMetaspaceAndOverheadFromTotalFlinkMemory* method of 
> ProcessMemoryUtils Class, the 
> [logic|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/config/memory/ProcessMemoryUtils.java#L170]
>  determines whether TotalProcessMemory is explicitly configured.
> In "false" branch(means TotalProcessMemory is not explicitly configured), the 
> [logic|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/config/memory/ProcessMemoryUtils.java#L184]
>  calls the *sanityCheckTotalProcessMemory* method.
> However, the main logic of *sanityCheckTotalProcessMemory* method only 
> executed [when TotalProcessMemory is explicitly 
> configured|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/config/memory/ProcessMemoryUtils.java#L247],
>  so the main logic probably never be executed.
>  
> Compare with [call 
> location|https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/config/memory/taskmanager/TaskExecutorFlinkMemoryUtils.java#L101]
>  of *sanityCheckTotalFlinkMemory* method(this method is similar to the logic 
> of the *sanityCheckTotalProcessMemory* method in that it compares whether the 
> derived memory size is consistent with the explicitly configured memory size) 
> in TaskExecutorFlinkMemoryUtils Class, i guess 
> *sanityCheckTotalProcessMemory* method should be called behind "if" branch, 
> not in the "if" branch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

Reply via email to