morhidi commented on PR #281:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/281#issuecomment-1167073080

   Nice job, @tweise! I was wondering if we could/should make the Reason field 
part of the FlinkResourceListener API? If we do so a call control layer could 
leverage it and could build some business logic on top of it. Even if we don't 
make it part of the API yet an enum type with the possible reason values would 
enforce some naming convention and consistency. What do you think?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to