morhidi commented on PR #281: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/281#issuecomment-1167073080
Nice job, @tweise! I was wondering if we could/should make the Reason field part of the FlinkResourceListener API? If we do so a call control layer could leverage it and could build some business logic on top of it. Even if we don't make it part of the API yet an enum type with the possible reason values would enforce some naming convention and consistency. What do you think? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org