Timo Walther created FLINK-4592:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Fix flaky test ScalarFunctionsTest.testCurrentTimePoint
                 Key: FLINK-4592
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4592
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Table API & SQL
            Reporter: Timo Walther


It seems that the test is still non deterministic.

{code}
org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.ScalarFunctionsTest
testCurrentTimePoint(org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.ScalarFunctionsTest)
  Time elapsed: 0.083 sec  <<< FAILURE!
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: Wrong result for: 
AS(>=(CHAR_LENGTH(CAST(CURRENT_TIMESTAMP):VARCHAR(1) CHARACTER SET "ISO-8859-1" 
COLLATE "ISO-8859-1$en_US$primary" NOT NULL), 22), '_c0') expected:<[tru]e> but 
was:<[fals]e>
        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:115)
        at 
org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase$$anonfun$evaluateExprs$1.apply(ExpressionTestBase.scala:126)
        at 
org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase$$anonfun$evaluateExprs$1.apply(ExpressionTestBase.scala:123)
        at 
scala.collection.mutable.LinkedHashSet.foreach(LinkedHashSet.scala:87)
        at 
org.apache.flink.api.table.expressions.utils.ExpressionTestBase.evaluateExprs(ExpressionTestBase.scala:123)
        at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor6.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
        at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
        at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:33)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
        at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
        at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:283)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:173)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:128)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:203)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:155)
        at 
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:103)
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to