[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15515279#comment-15515279
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4665:
---------------------------------------

GitHub user apivovarov opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2537

    [FLINK-4665] Remove boxing/unboxing to parse a primitive

    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4665

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/apivovarov/flink FLINK-4665

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2537.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2537
    
----
commit eeefde68405d27a828d15443b5815a4e53a6b34c
Author: Alexander Pivovarov <apivova...@gmail.com>
Date:   2016-09-23T03:27:08Z

    [FLINK-4665] Remove boxing/unboxing to parse a primitive

----


> Remove boxing/unboxing to parse a primitive
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-4665
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4665
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Java API
>            Reporter: Alexander Pivovarov
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> I found the following issues with boxing/unboxing and Integer
> 1. Current code doing boxing/unboxing to parse a primitive - It is more 
> efficient to just call the static parseXXX method.
> 2. boxing/unboxing to do type cast
> 3. new Integer instead of valueOf - Using new Integer(int) is guaranteed to 
> always result in a new object whereas Integer.valueOf(int) allows caching of 
> values to be done by the compiler.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to