[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17641624#comment-17641624
]
Runkang He commented on FLINK-30242:
------------------------------------
[~aitozi] thanks, the link is here:
[https://developer.aliyun.com/special/ffa2022?spm=ffa.ffa-home.0.0.35d843c9XkAp7b|https://developer.aliyun.com/special/ffa2022?spm=ffa.ffa-home.0.0.35d843c9XkAp7b,]
BTW, which scenario do you meet this problem, is it an urgent needs?
> Push localHashAggregate pass the union node
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-30242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30242
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Table SQL / Planner
> Reporter: Aitozi
> Priority: Major
>
> The local hash aggregate after union will have an extra shuffle stage. We can
> swap it with the union node so the local hash aggregate can chain with the
> mapper stage saving the unnecessary shuffle, especially in the batch job.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
