[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17695548#comment-17695548
 ] 

Wencong Liu commented on FLINK-30829:
-------------------------------------

I think it's necessary to sort the three columns separately. The calculation 
strategy is different between busy/idle/backpressure, and it may be updated in 
future. Therefore, it will be inaccurate to infer the top value of backpressure 
or idle percentage by sorted busy columns. WDYT? [~yunta] 

> Make the backpressure tab could be sort by the backpressure level
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-30829
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-30829
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Runtime / Web Frontend
>    Affects Versions: 1.17.0
>            Reporter: Zhanghao Chen
>            Priority: Major
>
> [FLINK-29998|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29998] enables user 
> to sort the backpressure tab to see which task is busiest. Another common 
> scenario for backpressure analysis is to find which tasks are backpressured. 
> We should add support to sort the backpressure tab by backpressure level as 
> well.
>  
> h4.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to