XComp commented on code in PR #22422:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/22422#discussion_r1173929303


##########
flink-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/leaderelection/DefaultLeaderElectionServiceTest.java:
##########
@@ -130,22 +137,101 @@ void testLeaderInformationChangedAndShouldBeCorrected() 
throws Exception {
     }
 
     @Test
-    void testHasLeadership() throws Exception {
+    void testHasLeadershipWithLeadershipButNoGrantEventProcessed() throws 
Exception {
         new Context() {
             {
-                runTest(
-                        () -> {
-                            testingLeaderElectionDriver.isLeader();
-                            final UUID currentLeaderSessionId =
-                                    leaderElectionService.getLeaderSessionID();
-                            assertThat(currentLeaderSessionId).isNotNull();
-                            
assertThat(leaderElectionService.hasLeadership(currentLeaderSessionId))
+                runTestWithManuallyTriggeredEvents(
+                        executorService -> {
+                            final UUID expectedSessionID = UUID.randomUUID();
+
+                            
testingLeaderElectionDriver.isLeader(expectedSessionID);
+
+                            
assertThat(leaderElectionService.hasLeadership(expectedSessionID))
+                                    .isFalse();
+                            
assertThat(leaderElectionService.hasLeadership(UUID.randomUUID()))
+                                    .isFalse();
+                        });
+            }
+        };
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void testHasLeadershipWithLeadershipAndGrantEventProcessed() throws 
Exception {
+        new Context() {
+            {
+                runTestWithManuallyTriggeredEvents(
+                        executorService -> {
+                            final UUID expectedSessionID = UUID.randomUUID();
+
+                            
testingLeaderElectionDriver.isLeader(expectedSessionID);
+                            executorService.trigger();
+
+                            
assertThat(leaderElectionService.hasLeadership(expectedSessionID))
                                     .isTrue();
                             
assertThat(leaderElectionService.hasLeadership(UUID.randomUUID()))
                                     .isFalse();
+                        });
+            }
+        };
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    void testHasLeadershipWithLeadershipLostButNoRevokeEventProcessed() throws 
Exception {
+        new Context() {
+            {
+                runTestWithManuallyTriggeredEvents(
+                        executorService -> {
+                            final UUID expectedSessionID = UUID.randomUUID();
+
+                            
testingLeaderElectionDriver.isLeader(expectedSessionID);
+                            executorService.trigger();
+                            testingLeaderElectionDriver.notLeader();
+
+                            
assertThat(leaderElectionService.hasLeadership(expectedSessionID))
+                                    .isFalse();

Review Comment:
   I was puzzled about that one as well at the start. But it makes sense: The 
HA backend (i.e. the driver) holds the ground truth of leadership. If the HA 
backend indicates the leadership loss, no operation should be executed that 
relies on `hasLeadership(UUID)` because another leader could have picked up in 
the meantime already. The `onRevokeLeadership` call that follows is used for 
cleaning up the component's leadership state only. Does that make sense?
   
   I could add a description to that assert to avoid other's wonder the same 
when reading the test code.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to