mxm commented on code in PR #586:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/586#discussion_r1187462259


##########
flink-kubernetes-operator-autoscaler/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/kubernetes/operator/autoscaler/config/AutoScalerOptions.java:
##########
@@ -87,28 +88,28 @@ private static ConfigOptions.OptionBuilder 
autoScalerConfig(String key) {
     public static final ConfigOption<Integer> VERTEX_MAX_PARALLELISM =
             autoScalerConfig("vertex.max-parallelism")
                     .intType()
-                    .defaultValue(Integer.MAX_VALUE)
+                    .defaultValue(200)
                     .withDescription(
                             "The maximum parallelism the autoscaler can use. 
Note that this limit will be ignored if it is higher than the max parallelism 
configured in the Flink config or directly on each operator.");
 
     public static final ConfigOption<Double> MAX_SCALE_DOWN_FACTOR =
             autoScalerConfig("scale-down.max-factor")
                     .doubleType()
-                    .defaultValue(0.6)
+                    .defaultValue(1.0)

Review Comment:
   The code looks like it works as expected. I've started a test pipeline to 
verify is this is still an issue.
   
   @X-czh In my use case there is a CPU per slot, so I might be less affected 
by this. In any case, we probably keep 0.6 as the default here.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to